OK let me explain my self a little bit better. Religious institutions and theories generally stifle science. One obvious example is that of Galileo. The church contended that scripture could prove that the Earth was firmly situated in it's place. Because the bible is inspired by God surely he/she is the most knowledgeable source for Science on the planet. Remember all the wacky JW thoughts on medical science? How about the Amish with their belief that modern technology is evil? The list goes on and on. What I was trying to point out was that these scientist while believing in God usually had to set aside their pre-conceived religious beliefs to test theory. According to the bible only God can create life, if you believe in the bible then you should not try to "clone" to create life. Religious dogma stifles that, and it is only one example. What if someone figured out a way to be immortal? Would that not defy all that is Christianity since only Christ can give us such a gift? To even attempt these things in Science you must throw out your religious conceptions. That is what I was trying to say.
The reason I am "yelling" even though I didn't use CAPS at all of this is because the ID people try to mislead and make it some sort of argument of a "theory", when it is only a Christian theory. I would like to ask again, if the theory were taught from a non Christian angle would the ID people still fight for it to be taught? That is the problem this isn't about a "theory" it's about a religious concept.